News & Insights Filters

Arguing Class Actions: Quality vs. Quantity—The Debate Over Reasonable Attorney Fees

Arguing Class Actions is a monthly column by Adam J. Levitt for the National Law Journal. Reprinted with permission from the September 9, 2024 edition of the National Law Journal.

09.09.24

Arguing Class Actions: Ringing the Bellwether—A Better Approach to Complex Multidistrict Litigation

08.05.24

Arguing Class Actions: In Defense of Defendant Class Actions

07.01.24

Arguing Class Actions: Trusting Juries and the Courts to Manage Damages Issues in Class Actions

06.03.24

Arguing Class Actions: Returning to the Plain Meaning of ‘Predominance’

05.06.24

Arguing Class Actions: The Supreme Court’s Evolving ‘Standing’ Standard and What It Means for Class Actions

04.01.24

Arguing Class Actions: Why the Catalyst Theory Matters

03.04.24

Dan Flynn and Anna Claire Skinner Publish “A look at the past and future of WOTUS” in Westlaw Today

DiCello Levitt Partner and Environmental Litigation Practice Chair Dan Flynn and Associate Anna Claire Skinner share their analysis of the past and future of the Waters of the U.S. under the Clean

05.16.23

DiCello Levitt Team Outlines Blueprint for Breaking the Diversity Barrier in Multidistrict Litigation

The legal profession has made great strides over the last 15 years to address diversity and inclusion issues. But when it comes to representing plaintiffs in large, multidistrict litigations,

03.07.23